CGNX vs LRCX: returns, Sharpe ratio and drawdown
Performance
CGNX+14.12%LRCX+83.23%
Summary
CGNX vs LRCX
Over the past year, LRCX returned +83.23% against +14.12% for CGNX. Over five years, LRCX averaged +36.46% a year, compared with -9.28% for CGNX. LRCX had the higher Sharpe ratio over the past year (1.20 vs 0.42), meaning more return for each unit of volatility. The worst peak-to-trough drop over the past year was -28.02% for CGNX and -41.76% for LRCX.
Current Drawdown
CGNX-25.45%LRCX-39.09%
Rolling Volatility
CGNX+2.99%LRCX+3.18%
METRICS
Correlation Matrix
Metrics
Risk Indicators
CGNXLRCX
Alpha
CGNX
7.31%
LRCX
47.74%
Beta
CGNX
1.89x
LRCX
3.21x
Sharpe
CGNX
0.42
LRCX
1.20
Sortino
CGNX
0.75
LRCX
1.84
Omega
CGNX
1.09
LRCX
1.22
Calmar
CGNX
0.50
LRCX
1.99
Martin
CGNX
1.68
LRCX
4.67
Comparisons