GMED vs XLV: returns, Sharpe ratio and drawdown
Performance
GMED+24.57%XLV+22.05%
Summary
GMED vs XLV
Over the past year, GMED returned +24.57% against +22.05% for XLV. Over five years, XLV averaged +5.76% a year, compared with -0.12% for GMED. XLV had the higher Sharpe ratio over the past year (1.05 vs 0.58), meaning more return for each unit of volatility. The worst peak-to-trough drop over the past year was -10.84% for XLV and -24.26% for GMED.
Current Drawdown
GMED-20.77%XLV-0.27%
Rolling Volatility
GMED+1.54%XLV+0.99%
METRICS
Correlation Matrix
Metrics
Risk Indicators
GMEDXLV
Alpha
GMED
22.02%
XLV
14.72%
Beta
GMED
0.68x
XLV
0.24x
Sharpe
GMED
0.58
XLV
1.05
Sortino
GMED
1.22
XLV
1.73
Omega
GMED
1.14
XLV
1.19
Calmar
GMED
1.01
XLV
2.03
Martin
GMED
2.15
XLV
3.57
Comparisons