LABU vs TNA: returns, Sharpe ratio and drawdown

Over the past year, LABU returned +61.53% against +9.72% for TNA. Over five years, TNA averaged -10.85% a year, compared with -28.71% for LABU. LABU had the higher Sharpe ratio over the past year (0.94 vs 0.36), meaning more return for each unit of volatility. The worst peak-to-trough drop over the past year was -32.56% for TNA and -41.78% for LABU.