XLK vs ZM: returns, Sharpe ratio and drawdown
Performance
XLK+27.33%ZM+14.99%
Summary
XLK vs ZM
Over the past year, XLK returned +27.33% against +14.99% for ZM. Over five years, XLK averaged +17.96% a year, compared with -19.38% for ZM. XLK had the higher Sharpe ratio over the past year (0.89 vs 0.44), meaning more return for each unit of volatility. The worst peak-to-trough drop over the past year was -16.15% for XLK and -25.92% for ZM.
Current Drawdown
XLK-9.17%ZM-15.81%
Rolling Volatility
XLK+1.33%ZM+2.34%
METRICS
Correlation Matrix
Metrics
Risk Indicators
XLKZM
Alpha
XLK
7.04%
ZM
10.03%
Beta
XLK
1.77x
ZM
1.02x
Sharpe
XLK
0.89
ZM
0.44
Sortino
XLK
1.29
ZM
0.66
Omega
XLK
1.16
ZM
1.08
Calmar
XLK
1.69
ZM
0.58
Martin
XLK
3.65
ZM
1.52
Comparisons