IMCG vs VOT: returns, Sharpe ratio and drawdown
Performance
Summary
IMCG vs VOT
Over the past year, IMCG returned +15.53% against +1.45% for VOT. Over five years, IMCG averaged +5.24% a year, compared with +2.73% for VOT. IMCG had the higher Sharpe ratio over the past year (0.68 vs -0.03), meaning more return for each unit of volatility. The worst peak-to-trough drop over the past year was -10.58% for IMCG and -13.36% for VOT. Dividends over the past year came to 0.67% of IMCG's price, against 0.62% for VOT. Their daily returns had a correlation of 0.97 over the past year, which is very high.
Ranking
How IMCG and VOT rank
Current Drawdown
Rolling Volatility
METRICS
Correlation Matrix
Fees and dividends
What IMCG and VOT cost and pay
IMCG charges 0.06% a year and VOT 0.05%. Over five years, reinvested dividends added 0.84 points a year to IMCG's return and 0.72 to VOT's.
Metrics
Risk Indicators
Alpha
Beta
Sharpe
Sortino
Omega
Calmar
Martin
Comparisons