URNM vs NLR: returns, Sharpe ratio and drawdown
Performance
Summary
URNM vs NLR
Over the past year, URNM returned -18.49% against -29.16% for NLR. Over five years, NLR averaged +13.38% a year, compared with +1.45% for URNM. URNM had the higher Sharpe ratio over the past year (-0.20 vs -0.65), meaning more return for each unit of volatility. The worst peak-to-trough drop over the past year was -48.46% for NLR and -52.29% for URNM. Dividends over the past year came to 3.97% of URNM's price, against 3.35% for NLR. Their daily returns had a correlation of 0.96 over the past year, which is very high.
Ranking
How URNM and NLR rank
Current Drawdown
Rolling Volatility
METRICS
Correlation Matrix
Fees and dividends
What URNM and NLR cost and pay
URNM charges 0.75% a year and NLR 0.52%. Over five years, reinvested dividends added 3.15 points a year to URNM's return and 2.63 to NLR's.
Metrics
Risk Indicators
Alpha
Beta
Sharpe
Sortino
Omega
Calmar
Martin
Comparisons